Maybe companies limit their options by establishing and maintaining a norm of office behaviour. Maybe letting people be people as long as they contribute with what they can and what they are good at, is enough to demand of your employees
Why?
I dont care if someone hangs a poster of their dog, their child, their partner or ozzy osbourne, unless the workspace is exposed to customers. Then i expect that there must be guidelines. I dont see how anime figures could offend anyone and i dont see how OP calls them half naked when they are fully clothed.
No 100%
There is no NSFW about that picture IMO
I can’t see why any reasonable workplace wouldn’t even allow one to have a poster like that hanging there
Sorry: Am I The Butt Face
I had to google that abbreviation and only came up with
Adventures In The Beetroot Field (booking agency; London, UK)
I eventually clicked on the reddit link though, after putting on some rubber gloves and taking a few anti-nausea pills. There i found the right explanation
call it a day
If they were afraid that the name Moana might be bullied at school, then Day would maybe be even worse
I got downvoted to hell for stating the same thing on reddit a couple of years ago!
Also, the choice was not just to avoid association with the porn star. The name Moana was not legally available to Disney in several European countries so they had to find a different name
He is making the greatest mistake of his career. What a shame to let pride and greed do this to the legacy he leaves behind
Is he making the greatest mistake of his career?
If you dont meed it any more, just have your account deleted
I believe that you can only deactivate through the menu but need a direct link to the deletion page
You argue that it is only the ones who voted for who decide, where as i say its all who were involved in the decision making. Who decides who becomes the president? Id say its all who vote. You say its only the ones who vote for the president. Maybe we both are right
Still, granding the president partly immunity by deciding this is how the law should be understood, should not be down to se few people.
BTW, trying to win an argument on US politics simply by taking ownership is just childish!
All 9 were part of the decision making. For me it is amazing that so important decisions are left to so few
All 9 were part of the decision making. For me it is amazing that so important decisions are left to so few
The 3 who voted against were also part of the decision makingjgroup. What blows my mind is, that decisions like these are left to be decided by so few
9 people decide to allow presidents to act as dictators
9 people decide to allow presidents to act as dictators
9 people decide to allow presidents to act as dictators
‘Teach Bible’… only churches should ‘teach bible’ and nobody should be forced to go to church.
Is it even christian to force a sermon onto people?
Some of the heads of churches are multimillionaire too though, and dont have to pay taxes. Churches are part of the problem.
But isn’t that their problem? Why bother what their personal priorities are?