But we do associate it with manhood. Until we move on from that mindset, it is an attack on someone’s manhood

“You will not get laid” is sorta the basic insult directed at men.

deleted by creator

MY GENUS IS NOT YOUR NAME

Stop genus appropriation now!

I was thinking of laughing

Would some Polynesian person naming their kid Richard or some other white bread name be problematic?

deleted by creator

Is the kid Bengali?

Bug related information? Yes

On linux, whether it is a native package or flatpak. I have to launch it twice for it to open.

Could it be yours is set to start in the tray?

It says “gaming skill”, not “gaining skill”. Whoever edited it forgot to edit that and “time playing”.

I think both actually had a live audience. In any case, the laugh doesn’t bother me.

I find all of them enjoyable. Not to an equal degree but still.

You’re right, I should’ve stopped a while ago

You think the difference between someone losing a case and the case against them being dismissed/dropped is legal semantics…? Not to mention, the first person was just wondering what case it was they said Trump lost…

Also just to absolutely clarify to everyone, when you said they are “playing devils advocate to a rapist” and called me “rape apologist” and so on, was that also sarcasm?

I guess Sarcasm really is above some people. I never disputed what they said no matter how hard you want to twist this narrative.

Everyone knew it was sarcasm but why you decided to start all sarcastic about it.

I just answered their pondering with sarcasm because of how ridiculous this whole thing is.

What was ridiculous about it, in your mind?

You must be on the spectrum to push this hard on me being snarky.

I don’t think they take that kind of comments well here. I don’t mind but just a heads up.

Person 1:

Technically not an accusation, Trump lost the lawsuit to Jane Doe. When Trump denied the allegations and accused her of defrauding him, he got sued again for defamation.

Trump raped a 13 year old girl.

Person 2:

Aren’t those different cases?

You:

Sure, the guy who says his friend likes girls on the younger side and that they are okay with it deserves the benefit of the doubt. Excuse me while I throw up.

The person 2 wasn’t even giving the benefit of the doubt, they were just confused about what case the earlier person was talking about (likely because Trump didn’t lose the mentioned Jane Doe case)

Person 3:

This particular case is, technically, an accusation, though. Even if we’re all just about certain that it’s true.

You:

Sure, I heard he totally respects women’s rights. He would be never think of purposely walking in on a young girl changing… Ohh wait

Person 3:

Did you even read what I said? I agree with you there. But technically, and I’m only bringing this up because you originally did, it is an accusation.

I think here Person 3 thought you were Person 1 who originally said the “technically not an accusation” thing.

You:

Suuuure, I am just calling bullshit on it. You are okay, even if your playing devils advocate to a rapist.

That’s when I commented. I really don’t know how this looks to you (and it gets worse from there) but nobody was playing devil’s advocate, nobody was giving benefit of the doubt even, there was no rape apologia. I’m not sure if it was meant to be a joke on your part but it just seems like you misinterpreted what was being said and flew off the handle.

Technically not an accusation, Trump lost the lawsuit to Jane Doe Link to comment

From the article, right below the title

The anonymous plaintiff dropped her lawsuit against Trump (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation)

Wikipedia:

A lawsuit filed in California in April 2016 accused Trump and Jeffrey Epstein of forcibly raping three 12 and 13-year-old girls at underage sex parties at Epstein’s Manhattan residence in 1994. The case was dismissed the following month. A second version of the lawsuit was filed in New York in June by a Jane Doe claiming to have been raped by the pair at four 1994 parties when she was 13 years old. It was withdrawn in October as the plaintiff said she had received death threats. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations#Jane_Doe_(1994))

You don’t have to trust my reading comprehension since the comment and the links are right there. Surely you trust your own comprehension.

You don’t have any skin in this game, you have never been raped nor do you have daughters. Just another rape apologist pretending to be a bro.

It’s not rape apologia to say that Trump didn’t lose the case. Unless you are accusing Vox (and Wikipedia) of rape apologia.

Thanks, I was interested in reading the article to get what she was arguing for. Especially the start of the article is interesting but at the end she seems to be calling against “division” and not “punishing” the rich because that’d alianete some of their voters. Wah wah.