• 0 Posts
  • 603 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle




  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoScience Memes@mander.xyzExplain that, science nerds!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    But we do know because thousands of hardworking scientists have devoted their lives to answering this question.

    If you want to have fun speculating wildly then be clear that this is what you’re doing and don’t frame it as things that “will” happen.

    Sorry this is a pet peeve of mine because I think it feeds into a paralyzing pessimism. People need to understand that we aren’t doomed to feel like they can work for a better future.













  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoScience Memes@mander.xyzDomestication
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Right, that’s what I mean. Agricultural societies were likely better organized and more populous and so better able to defend and expel rivals from their lands. Foragers were forced into increasingly marginal lands over time, and all forager societies today exist on land that is essentially unsuited for agriculture, which is the only reason they have survived to this day.




  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.nettoScience Memes@mander.xyzDomestication
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Since there’s no written record, it’s hard to know for sure but I believe it was because agricultural communities were able to reproduce much faster and live at much higher densities, so they tended to win conflicts and displace societies based on foraging—even though foragers had better quality of life and didn’t normally experience the food shortages people imagine.

    That said, modern foraging societies have largely converted to agriculture after being subjugated and not because they were hungry. So there is some evidence to support this hypothesis.