You’re technically correct, you can use any of them. It’s honestly just a matter of preference.
You’re technically correct, you can use any of them. It’s honestly just a matter of preference.
That’s doable too. A lot of people don’t realize you can route all of those together. It’s even more fun as technically you can route private addresses across public links if you own both ends of the link. Used to see that done at a large ISP to route their internal network and it’d pop new networking admins minds.
ETA: I would use 192.x IPs for unrouted subnets like heartbeats or iSCSI.
Yeah. Here’s a breakdown of the allocations and their sizes:
Most home applications only need a single /24 (256 addresses) so they are perfectly fine with 192.168.0.0/24, but as you get larger businesses, you don’t use every single address but instead break it out by function so it’s easier to know what is what and to provide growth in each area.
I know what subnetting is for. That’s why I know which RFC range to use. I’m talking based on the number of devices and needed groupings, 172 is a good sweet spot where 198.x would be a bit tight and 10.x is complete overkill.
Here’s how it’s gonna work:
Because, sadly, some of those others are still in limbo, Canon will be more than happy to put things on hold “while preceding matters are sorted out”
So I guess I must be a leet haxor because of all the businesses I configured for the 172.x space because 192.168.x space was too small and 10.x space was way the hell too big.
Killing vampires.
Except fireworks has literally been a part of civilization for 1,000 plus years, so I don’t see that changing anytime soon.
I really hope you meant “switch” when saying “hub”. I haven’t seen a hub used in decades. Also your switch should have some level of STP protection enabled to prevent that. Even if someone had a hub with a routing loop, STP would have disabled the ports.
They’ll do anything not to build EVs /s
Plot twist: the guy exists but doesn’t suffer from an inferiority complex, which is why he wasn’t invited.
That’s like whipping out a Carolina Reaper when you’re only used to Jalepeños…
Add it to the pile…
back in time by 20 years to start WW2
Boy here is posting from all the way back in 1959….
Don’t know why you’re getting downvoted. You’re correct. Pure capitalism is free from regulations. The goal is that the “market can regulate itself”. We’ve seen what happens with less regulations. It’s not hard to imagine it with no regulations (“safety regulations are written in blood”), but never have we had “pure capitalism”
The part that may be getting downvoted is your second sentiment, which though I would love, I don’t see a path for it right now.
Pro tip for guys (by a guy): Always make sure she has at least one orgasm before you blow your load. Commit to oral and you’ll go a long way.
Look up Anycast when you get a chance.