• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Oh 100%. They are completely full of shit. There is no answer you could give them that would satisfy them and they were never asking the question in good faith to begin with. Its also not really an important question. Its something we can answer at the convention.

    Literally almost all Democrats poll 10-20 points higher than Biden. So the answer is “any of them”. Literally any Democrat could would be enough of an improvement to stop Trump in his tracks.

    And there are some solid picks out there. I really think Kamala would be fine; she would invigorate the african-american vote, and guarantee us black-woman voters (which might be a big fucking problem if she isn’t the nominee). Newsom is like, greased-up-deaf-guy slick, but he’s got a machine behind him. I would want someone progressive like Witmer, but I just don’t care at this point. Any one. I think the most strategic choice would be Andy Beshear (2x Democratic southern governor like Bill Clinton; steal Kentucky from the Republicans) would be a very smart strategic choice.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Kamala would sway any centrists towards Trump hands down. There is no brand recognition here besides maybe AOC and she’d fit a VP pick better. I fear a new candidate will only fracture us and ensure a Trump victory. There’s so much at stake for such uncertainty. I can say I will vote for whoever is opposing Trump and Project 2025. I just hope more than half the country is seeing all this shit and thinking “Nah, I dont want a king.”

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        It is a worthwhile fear. As is doing nothing. Both are very valid fears.

        About the king though, that ship has sailed. It would take an act of Congress to fix that, hence there is basically no chance before the election and possibly not ever afterwards. Best we can do is a god-king emperor that chooses not to exercise their powers, or else does so really sneakily so that we can’t tell the difference - since ofc we are unable to even ask. We will literally never know if it is not happening - though ofc when it becomes really obvious that it is being used, then we’ll know. As such, Democracy is dead, long live our next king, whoever they may be.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        You dont need name/ brand recognition at this level. Its the presidency and there will only be two options. Its the wrong rule-stick for this level of race. If this were a house race or even a senate seat, sure. But not for whomever will carry the Democratic nomination.

        I fear a new candidate will only fracture us

        This is a weird talking point that has suddenly become very consistent.

        Bro. We’re already fully fractured and its Biden thats done the fracturing. Don’t fear the unknown: fear the known failure the commentators here have been telling you that you are pot-committed to. Thats a far far far bigger concern than not going to the convention with a candidate in hand.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah I can’t really agree with just about anything you said. We weren’t fractured until people decided the debate meant the world and his actual work in office right now doesn’t mean shit.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            You are living in a delusional fantasy. Biden’s polling was CATASTROPHIC before the debate. Why?

            Because Biden split the party in how he has handled Gaza.

            Its unbelievable the amount of delusion people around here try and persist with.

            • Sanctus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Definitely not, maybe for terminally online people. But for most of the actual democratic american populace Gaza didn’t mean that much. Thats the sad truth, people mostly care about what’s happening at home, centrists especially.